Paradise and Hell according to Orthodox
tradition
By
Protopresbyter George
Metallinos
Dean of the Athens University School of
Theology
|
On the Last Sunday of Lent “we commemorate the Second
and Incorruptible Coming of our Lord Jesus Christ”. The expression “we
commemorate” of the Book of Saints confirms that our Church, as the Body of
Christ, re-enacts in its worship the Second Coming of Christ as an “event” and
not just something that is historically expected. The reason is, that through
the Divine Eucharist, we are transported to the celestial kingdom, to
meta-history. It is in this orthodox perspective, that the subject of paradise
and hell is approached.
In the Gospels (Matthew, ch.5), mention is made of
“kingdom” and “eternal fire”. In this excerpt, which is cited during the Liturgy
of this Sunday, the “kingdom” is the divine destination of mankind. The “fire”
is “prepared” for the devil and his angels (demons), not because God desired it,
but because they are impenitent. The “kingdom” is “prepared” for those who
remain faithful to the will of God. “Kingdom” (the uncreated glory) is Paradise.
“Fire” (eternal) is hell (eternal hell, v.46). At the beginning of history, God
invites man into paradise, into a communion with His uncreated Grace. At the
end of history, man has to face paradise and hell. What this means, we shall
see, further down. We do however stress that it is one of the central subjects
of our faith – it is Orthodox Christianity’s philosopher’s
stone.
1.
Mention of paradise and hell in the New Testament is frequent. In Luke 23, 43,
Christ says to the robber on the cross: “Today you will be with me in paradise”.
However, the robber also refers to paradise, when he says: “Remember me, Lord…in
your kingdom”. According to Theofylaktos of Bulgaria (P 123, 1106), “for the
robber was in paradise, in other words, the kingdom”. The Apostle Paul
(Corinthians II, 12: 3-4) confesses that, while still in this lifetime, he was
“swept up to paradise and heard unspoken words, which are inappropriate for man
to repeat.” In Revelations, we read: “To the victor, I shall give him to eat of
the tree of life, which is in the paradise of my God” (2,7). And Arethas of
Caesaria interprets: “paradise is understood to be the blessed and eternal life”
(PG 106, 529). Paradise-eternal life-kingdom of God, are all related.
References on hell: Matthew 25, 46 (“to eternal
damnation”), 25, 41 (“eternal fire”), 25 30 (“the outermost darkness”), 5, 22
(“the place of fire”). John I, 4, 18 (“…for fear contains hell”). These are
ways that express what we mean by “hell”.
2.
Paradise and hell are not two different places. (This version is
an idolatrous concept.) They signify two different situations (ways), which
originate from the same uncreated source, and are perceived by man as two,
different experiences. Or, more precisely, they are the same experience, except
that they are perceived differently by man, depending on man’s internal state.
This experience is: the sight of Christ inside the uncreated light of His
divinity, of His “glory”. From the moment of His Second Coming, through to all
eternity, all people will be seeing Christ in His uncreated light. That is when
“those who worked good deeds in their lifetime will go towards the resurrection
of their life, while those who worked evil in their lifetime will go towards the
resurrection of judgment” (John 5, 29). In the presence of Christ, mankind will
be separated (“sheep” and “goats”, to His right and His left). In other words,
they will be discerned in two separate groups: those who will be looking upon
Christ as paradise (the “exceeding good, the radiant”) and those who will be
looking upon Christ as hell (“the all-consuming fire”, Hebrews
12,29).
Paradise and hell are the same reality. This is what is
depicted in the portrayal of the Second Coming. From Christ a river flows
forth: it is radiant like a golden light at the upper end of it, where the
saints are. At its lower end, the same river is fiery, and it is in that part
of the river that the demons and the unrepentant (“the never repentant”
according to a hymn) are depicted. This is why in Luke 2, 34 we read that
Christ stands “as the fall and the resurrection of many”. Christ becomes the
resurrection into eternal life, for those who accepted Him and who followed the
suggested means of healing the heart; and to those who rejected Him, He becomes
their demise and their hell.
Patristic testimonies: Saint John of Sinai (of the Ladder) says that the
uncreated light of Christ is “an all-consuming fire and an illuminating light”.
Saint Gregory Palamas (E.P.E. II, 498) observes: “Thus, it is said, He will
baptize you by the Holy Spirit and by fire: in other words, by illumination and
punishment, depending on each person’s predisposition, which will bring upon him
that which he deserves.” Elsewhere, (Essays, P. Christou Publications, vol.2,
page 145): The light of Christ, “albeit one and accessible to all, is not
partaken of uniformly, but differently”.
Consequently, paradise and hell are not a reward or a
punishment (condemnation), but the way that we individually experience the sight
of Christ, depending on the condition of our heart. God doesn’t punish in
essence, although, for educative purposes, the Scripture does mention
punishment. The more spiritual that one becomes, the better he can comprehend
the language of the Scripture and our traditions. Man’s condition
(clean-unclean, repentant-unrepentant) is the factor that determines the
acceptance of the Light as “paradise” or “hell”.
3. The
anthropological issue in Orthodoxy is that man will eternally look upon Christ
as paradise and not as hell; that man will partake of His heavenly and eternal
“kingdom”. And this is where we see the difference between Christianity as
Orthodoxy and the various other religions. The other religions promise a
certain “blissful” state, even after death. Orthodoxy however is not a quest
for bliss, but a cure from the illness of religion, as the late father John
Romanides so patristically teaches. Orthodoxy is an open hospital within
history (“spiritual infirmary” according to Saint John the Chrysostom), which
offers the healing (catharsis) of the heart, in order to finally attain
“theosis”- the only destination of man. This is the course that has been so
comprehensively described by father John Romanides and the Rev. Metropolitan of
Nafpaktos, Hierotheos (Vlachos); it is the healing of mankind, as experienced by
all of our Saints.
This is the meaning of life in the body of Christ (the
Church). This is the Church’s reason for existence. This is what Christ’s whole
redemptory work aspired to. Saint Gregory Palamas (4th Homily on the
Second Coming) says that the pre-eternal will of God for man is “to find a place
in the majesty of the divine kingdom”- to reach theosis. That was the purpose
of creation. And he continues: “But even His divine and secret kenosis, His
god-human conduct, His redemptory passions, and every single mystery (in other
words, all of Christ’s opus on earth) were all providentially and omnisciently
pre-determined for this very end (purpose).
4. The
important thing, however, is that not all people respond to this invitation of
Christ, and that is why not everyone partakes in the same way of His uncreated
glory. This is taught by Christ, in the parable of the rich and the poor
Lazarus (Luke, ch.16). Man refuses Christ’s offer, he becomes God’s enemy and
rejects the redemption offered by Christ (which is a blasphemy against the Holy
Spirit, because it is within the Holy Spirit that we accept the calling of
Christ). This is the “never repentant” person referred to in the hymn. God
“never bears enmity”, the blessed Chrysostom observes; it is we who
become His enemies; we are the ones who reject Him. The unrepentant man
becomes demonized, because he has chosen to. God doesn’t want this.
Saint Gregory Palamas says: “…for this was not My pre-existing will; I did not
create you for this purpose; I did not prepare the pyre for you. This undying
pyre was pre-fired for the demons who bear the unchanging trait of evil, to whom
your own unrepentant opinion attracted you.” “The co-habitation with mischievous
angels is arbitrary (voluntary).” (same as prev.) In other words, it is
something that is freely chosen by man.
Both the rich man and Lazarus were looking upon the same
reality, i.e., God in His uncreated light. The rich man reached the Truth, the
sight of Christ, but could not partake of it, as Lazarus did. The poor Lazarus
received “consolation”, whereas the rich man received “anguish”. Christ’s
words, that they: “have Moses and the prophets” –for those still in the world-
signifies that we are all inexcusable. Because we have the Saints, who have
experienced theosis and who call upon us to accede to their way of life so that
we too might reach theosis like they did. We therefore conclude that those who
have chosen evil ways – like the rich man - are inexcusable.
Our stance towards our fellow man is indicative of our
inner state, and that is why this will be the criterion of Judgment Day during
Christ’s Second Coming (Matthew, ch.25). This doesn’t imply that faith, or man’s
faithfulness to Christ is disregarded; faith is naturally a prerequisite,
because our stance towards each other will show whether or not we have God
inside us. The first Sundays of the Triodion preceding Lent revolve around
fellow man. On the first of these Sundays, the (seemingly pious) Pharisee
justifies (sanctifies) himself and rejects (derogates) the Tax-collector. On the
second Sunday, the “elder” brother (a repetition of the seemingly pious
Pharisee) is sorrowed by the return (salvation) of his brother. Likewise
seemingly pious, he too had false piety, which did not produce love. On the
third (carnival) Sunday, this stance reaches Christ’s seat of judgment, and is
evidenced as the criterion for our eternal life.
5. The
experience of paradise or hell is beyond words or the senses. It is an
uncreated reality, and not a created one. The Franks created the myth that
paradise and hell are both created realities. It is a myth, that the damned will
not be looking upon God; just as the “absence of God” is equally a myth. The
Franks had also perceived the fires of hell as something created (e.g. Dante’s
Inferno). Orthodox tradition has remained faithful to the Scriptural claim that
the damned shall see God (like the rich man of the parable), but will perceive
Him only as “an all-consuming fire”. The Frankish scholastics accepted hell as
punishment and the deprivation of a tangible vision of the divine essence.
Biblically and patristically however, “hell” is understood as man’s failure to
collaborate with Divine Grace, in order to reach the “illuminating” view of God
(paradise) and selfless love (per Corinthians I, 13:8): “love….. does not demand
any reciprocation”). Consequently, there is no such thing as “God’s absence”,
only His presence. That is why His Second Coming is dire (“o, what an hour it
will be then”, we chant in the Laudatory hymns). It is an irrefutable reality,
toward which Orthodoxy is permanently oriented (“I anticipate resurrection of
the dead…”)
The damned - those who are depraved at heart, just like
the Pharisees (Mark 3:5: “in the callousness of their hearts”) - eternally
perceive the pyre of hell as their salvation! It is because their condition is
not susceptible to any other form of salvation. They too are “finalized” – they
reach the end of their road – but only the righteous reach the end of the road
as saved persons. The others finish as damned. “Salvation” to them is hell,
since in their lifetime, they pursued only pleasure. The rich man of the parable
had “enjoyed all of his riches”. The poor Lazarus uncomplainingly endured “every
suffering”. The Apostle Paul expresses this (Corinthians I, 3 :13-15): “Each
person’s work, whatever it is, will be tested by fire. If their work survives
the test, then whatever they built, will be rewarded accordingly. If one’s work
is burnt by the fire, then he will suffer losses; he shall be saved, thus, as
though by fire.” The righteous and the unrepentant shall both pass through the
uncreated “fire” of divine presence, however, the one shall pass through
unscathed, while the other shall be burnt. He too is “saved”, but only in the
way that one passes through a fire. Efthimios Zigavinos (12th
century) observes in this respect: “God as fire that illuminates and brightens
the pure, and burns and obscures the unclean.” And Theodoritos Kyrou regarding
this “saving” writes: “One is also saved by fire, being tested by it”, just as
when one passes through fire. If he has an appropriate protective cover, he
will not be burnt, otherwise, he may be “saved”, but he will be
charred!
Consequently, the fire of hell has nothing in common
with the Frankish “purgatory”, nor is it created, nor is it punishment, or an
intermediate stage. A viewpoint such as this, is virtually a transferal of
one’s accountability to God. But the accountability is entirely our own,
whether we choose to accept or reject the salvation (healing) that is offered by
God. “Spiritual death” is the viewing of the uncreated light, of divine glory,
as a pyre, as fire. Saint John the Chrysostom in his 9th homily on
Corinthians I, notes: “Hell is
never-ending…...sinners shall be judged into a never-ending suffering. As for
the “being burnt altogether”, it means this: that he does not withstand the
strength of the fire.” And he continues : “And he (Paul) says, it means this: that he
shall not be thus burnt also - like his works – into nothingness, but he shall
continue to exist, only inside that fire. He therefore considers this as his
“salvation”. For it is customary for us to say “saved in the fire”, when
referring to materials that are not totally burnt
away”.
Scholastic perceptions-interpretations, which, through
Dante’s work (Inferno) have permeated our world, have consequences that amount
to idolatrous views. An example is the separation of paradise and hell as two
different places. This has happened, because they did not distinguish between
the created and the uncreated. Also, the denial of hell’s eternity, with their
idea of the “restoration” of everything, or the concept of a “good God” (Bon
Dieu). God is indeed “benevolent: (Matthew 8,17), since He offers salvation to
everyone. (“He wants all to be saved…..” Timothy I, 2,4) However, the words of
our Lord as heard during the funeral service are formidable: “I cannot do
anything on my own; just as I hear, thus I judge, and my judgment is fair”.(John
5,30). Equally manufactured is the concept of “theodicy”, which applies in this
case. Everything is finally attributed to God alone (i.e., if He intends to
redeem or condemn), without taking into consideration man’s “collaboration” as a
factor of redemption. Salvation is possible, only within the framework of
collaboration between man and Divine Grace. According to the blessed
Chrysostom, “the utmost, almost everything, is God’s; He did however leave
something little to us”. That “little something” is our acceptance of God’s
invitation. The robber on the cross was saved, “by using the key request of
‘remember me’…”! Also idolatrous is the perception of a God becoming outraged
against a sinner, whereas we mentioned earlier that God “never shows enmity”.
This is a juridical perception of God, which also leads to the prospect of
“penances” in confessions as forms of punishment, and not as medications (means
of healing).
6. The
mystery of paradise-hell is also experienced in the life of the Church in the
world. During the sacraments, there is a participation of the faithful in Grace,
so that Grace may be activated in our lives, by our course towards Christ.
Especially during the Divine Eucharist, the uncreated –holy communion- becomes
inside us either paradise or hell, depending on our condition. But mostly, our
participation in Holy Communion is a participation in paradise or hell,
throughout history. That is why we beseech God, prior to receiving Holy
Communion, to render the Precious Gifts inside us “not as judgment or
condemnation”, or “as eternal damnation”. This is why participation in Holy
Communion is linked to the overall spiritual course of the faithful. When we
approach Holy Communion uncleansed and unrepentant, we are condemned (burnt).
Holy Communion inside us becomes the “inferno” and “spiritual death”. Not
because it is transformed into those things of course, but because our own
uncleanliness cannot accept Holy Communion as “paradise”. Given that Holy
Communion is called “medication for immortality” (Saint Ignatius the God-bearer,
2nd century), the same thing exactly occurs as with any medication.
If our organism does not have the prerequisites to absorb the medication, then
the medication will produce side-effects and will kill instead of heal. It is
not the medication that is responsible, but the condition of our organism. It
must be stressed, that if we do not accept Christianity as a therapeutic
process, and its sacraments as spiritual medication, then we are led to a
“religionizing” of Christianity; in other words, we “idolatrize” it. And
unfortunately, this is a frequent occurrence, when we perceive Christianity as a
“religion”.
Besides, this lifetime is evaluated in the light of the
twin criterion of paradise-hell. “Ask first for the kingdom of God and His
righteousness”, our Christ recommends (Matthew 6,33). Vasileios the Great tells
the Young (ch.3) “Everything we do is in preparation of another life”. Our life
must be a continuous preparation for our participation in “paradise” – our
community with the Uncreated John 17,3). And everything begins from this
lifetime. That is why the Apostle Paul says: “Behold, now is the opportune time.
Behold, now is the day of redemption.” (Corinthians II, 6:2) Every moment of
our lives is of redemptive importance. Either we gain eternity, the eternal
community with God, or we lose it. This is why oriental religions and cults
that preach reincarnations are injuring mankind: they are virtually
transferring the problem to other, (nonexistent of course) lifetimes. The thing
is, however, that only one life corresponds to each of us, whether we are saved
or condemned. This is why Vasileios the Great continues: “those things
therefore that lead us towards that life, we need to say should be cherished and
pursued with all our might; and those that do not lead us there, we should
disregard, as something of no value”. This is the criterion of Christian living.
A Christian continuously chooses whatever favors his salvation. We gain
paradise or lose it and end up in hell, in this lifetime. That is why John the
Evangelist says: “Whomsoever believes in Him shall not be judged; whomsoever
does not believe in Him, has already been judged, for not having believed in the
name of the only-begotten Son of God.” (3, 18)
Consequently, the work of the church is not to “send”
people to paradise or to hell, but to prepare them for the final judgment. The
work of the Clergy is therapeutic and not moralistic or character-shaping, in
the temporal sense of the word. The essence of life in Christ is preserved in
monasteries – naturally wherever they are Orthodox and of course patristic. The
purpose of the Church’s offered therapy is not to create “useful” citizens and
essentially “usable” ones, but citizens of the celestial (uncreated) kingdom.
Such citizens are the Confessors and the Martyrs - the true faithful, the
saints.
However, this is also the way that our mission is
supervised: What are we inviting people to? To the Church as a Hospital/Therapy
Center, or just an ideology that is labelled “Christian”? More often than not, we strive to secure a place in
“paradise”, instead of striving to be healed. That is why we focus on rituals
and not on therapy. This of course does not signify a rejection of worship. But,
without ascesis (spiritual exercise, ascetic lifestyle, act of therapy), worship
cannot hallow us. The Grace that pours forth from it remains inert inside us.
Orthodoxy doesn’t make any promises to send mankind to any sort of paradise or
hell; but it does have the power – as evidenced by the incorruptible and
miracle-working relics of our saints (incorruptibility=theosis) – to prepare
man, so that he may forever look upon the Uncreated Grace and the Kingdom of
Christ as Paradise, and not as Hell.
πηγή : users.uoa.gr
|
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου